{"id":15084,"date":"2019-08-13T04:10:52","date_gmt":"2019-08-13T08:10:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.shorebeat.com\/brick\/?p=15084"},"modified":"2019-08-13T04:10:52","modified_gmt":"2019-08-13T08:10:52","slug":"brick-council-set-to-vote-on-resolution-opposing-murphys-immigration-policy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/shorebeat.com\/brick\/2019\/08\/brick-council-set-to-vote-on-resolution-opposing-murphys-immigration-policy\/","title":{"rendered":"Brick Council Set to Vote on Resolution Opposing Murphy’s Immigration Policy"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"The<\/a>

The Brick Township municipal complex. (Photo: Daniel Nee)<\/p><\/div>\n

Immigration policy, a discussion that has divided Americans along political and ideological lines, has the potential to do so in Brick Township Tuesday night.<\/p>\n

Among more routine agenda items listed to be taken up by the township council at its meeting Tuesday night is a resolution opposing the \u201cImmigrant Trust Directive<\/a>,\u201d a policy of the administration of Gov. Phil Murphy and codified by his attorney general, Gurbir S. Grewal, that limits the level of cooperation that can exist between local and county law enforcement agencies and federal immigration agents.<\/p>\n

The resolution was first suggested by Councilman Jim Fozman<\/a>, the governing body\u2019s sole Republican member. When Fozman first proposed it at the July 23 council meeting, his motion did not receive a second, and Council President Andrea Zapcic said that resolutions normally are reviewed by a committee of three members before they are placed on the agenda. The resolution does, indeed, appear on the agenda for the Aug. 13 meeting, and could place Democrats on the council in the precarious position of having to oppose one of the signature policies of Murphy, a Democratic governor. Voting down the resolution, however, has the potential to isolate conservative Brick voters during a year when Republicans are making a push to retake the majority of the seats on the council.<\/p>\n

Mayor John Ducey, a Democrat, does not vote on resolutions at council meeting under Brick\u2019s form of government. But he placed enough importance on the issue to send out a letter to every household in Brick (paid for through his campaign account, not from tax dollars) detailing his own stance in the ongoing debate over immigration enforcement. Ducey said he opposed Brick becoming a \u201csanctuary city\u201d when Fozman first proposed the resolution.<\/p>\n

\u201cEven though I am a Democrat, I strongly disagree with this policy,\u201d he said. \u201cIn fact, I was the first mayor in New Jersey, Democrat or Republican, to speak out against the governor\u2019s sanctuary state plan.\u201d<\/p>\n

Ducey has made statements opposing \u201csanctuary state\u201d legislation as far back as at least 2017. He first brought up his opposition in response to a question from a resident during one of his bi-weekly Facebook Live town hall sessions.<\/p>\n

Ducey became swept into the immigration issue after township Republicans began running ads on social media platforms linking Ducey to Murphy\u2019s policies by using an image of Murphy ceremonially swearing Ducey in to his current term as mayor.<\/p>\n

\"N.J.<\/a>

N.J. Gov-Elect Phil Murphy swears in Brick Mayor John Ducey. (Photo: Daniel Nee)<\/p><\/div>\n

Ducey, in the letter, accused Republicans of \u201cspreading lies\u201d about him in an attempt to \u201cdistract you from my record \u2013 and theirs.\u201d<\/p>\n

The letter went on to tout a number of Ducey\u2019s policies, including eliminating red light cameras, keeping tax increases to an average of 1 percent per year and introducing busing for senior citizens and events like the weekly farmers\u2019 market.<\/p>\n

Ultimately, Ducey\u2019s stance on immigration will not be a factor in whether the council passes the resolution passes muster with the council. The version of the resolution on Tuesday\u2019s agenda differs slightly from the one initially proposed by Fozman \u2013 including the explicit mention of Ducey\u2019s opposition \u2013 but otherwise resolves that the township of Brick supports Ocean County\u2019s litigation against Murphy and Grewal, and \u201curged the governor and state legislature to re-evaluate their position with regard to New Jersey becoming a sanctuary state.<\/p>\n

Public comment will be taken at the meeting, which begins at 7 p.m. at the township municipal complex.<\/p>\n

\n\t
\n\t\t

<\/p>\n\t\t

<\/p>\n\t\t

Should the Brick Council Vote to Formally Oppose New Jersey's 'Sanctuary State' Status?<\/strong><\/p>