{"id":4856,"date":"2015-05-29T02:21:44","date_gmt":"2015-05-29T06:21:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.shorebeat.com\/brick\/?p=4856"},"modified":"2015-05-29T02:22:38","modified_gmt":"2015-05-29T06:22:38","slug":"brick-school-board-to-reconsider-bus-driver-layoff-plan-amidst-protests","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/shorebeat.com\/brick\/2015\/05\/brick-school-board-to-reconsider-bus-driver-layoff-plan-amidst-protests\/","title":{"rendered":"Brick School Board To Reconsider Bus Driver Layoff Plan"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"attachment_4857\" style=\"width: 628px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.shorebeat.com\/brick\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/05\/DSC_0195.jpg\" data-rel=\"lightbox-image-0\" data-rl_title=\"\" data-rl_caption=\"\" title=\"\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-4857\" class=\"size-large wp-image-4857\" src=\"https:\/\/www.shorebeat.com\/brick\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/05\/DSC_0195-1024x681.jpg\" alt=\"Protest signs carried into a Board of Education meeting by Brick Township bus drivers. (Photo: Daniel Nee)\" width=\"618\" height=\"411\" srcset=\"https:\/\/shorebeat.com\/brick\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/05\/DSC_0195-1024x681.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/shorebeat.com\/brick\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/05\/DSC_0195-240x160.jpg 240w, https:\/\/shorebeat.com\/brick\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/05\/DSC_0195-400x266.jpg 400w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 618px) 100vw, 618px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-4857\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Protest signs carried into a Board of Education meeting by Brick Township bus drivers. (Photo: Daniel Nee)<\/p><\/div>\n<p>The Brick Township school board voted Thursday night to delay a plan to lay off 26 school bus drivers during a meeting that lasted more than six hours into early Friday morning.<\/p>\n<p>One-by-one, school bus drivers and union leaders addressed the board, describing a chaotic working environment and severe management issues that visibly took board members by surprise, culminating in the vote to delay the layoffs while policies in the Transportation Department can be reviewed and additional negotiations can be undertaken with the Transport Workers Union, which represents the drivers.<\/p>\n<p>Putting off the layoffs could backfire, however, if the district does not find a way to save more than $400,000 since the district has already adopted its budget for the 2015-16 school year, which factored in savings based on the layoffs.<\/p>\n<p>The board \u201canticipated those cost savings,\u201d said board attorney Jack Sahradnik. \u201cOne of the issues you have is, if the decision is not to go forward with a reduction in force, then you\u2019re going to have to look at where you\u2019re going to come up with the money to fund it. At some point during the course of the year, if money is not available, you\u2019re going to run out of money for your transportation services.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Brick has budgeted $8,048,580 for transportation services for next school year, a reduction of $437,659 from the 2014-15 school year. The savings through layoffs would be achieved primarily by reducing health benefits costs rather than salaries. While school bus drivers main earn about $25,000 per year, they are entitled to what is widely considered a generous health care benefits package.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_4858\" style=\"width: 250px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.shorebeat.com\/brick\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/05\/DSC_0196.jpg\" data-rel=\"lightbox-image-1\" data-rl_title=\"\" data-rl_caption=\"\" title=\"\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-4858\" class=\"size-thumbnail wp-image-4858\" src=\"https:\/\/www.shorebeat.com\/brick\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/05\/DSC_0196-240x160.jpg\" alt=\"A packed house at the May 28, 2015 Brick Board of Education meeting. (Photo: Daniel Nee)\" width=\"240\" height=\"160\" srcset=\"https:\/\/shorebeat.com\/brick\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/05\/DSC_0196-240x160.jpg 240w, https:\/\/shorebeat.com\/brick\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/05\/DSC_0196-400x266.jpg 400w, https:\/\/shorebeat.com\/brick\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/05\/DSC_0196-1024x681.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/shorebeat.com\/brick\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/05\/DSC_0196-290x195.jpg 290w, https:\/\/shorebeat.com\/brick\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/05\/DSC_0196-600x399.jpg 600w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 240px) 100vw, 240px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-4858\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">A packed house at the May 28, 2015 Brick Board of Education meeting. (Photo: Daniel Nee)<\/p><\/div>\n<p>Bus drivers made a forceful showing at the meeting, packing the auditorium at Brick Township High School and detailing inefficiencies stemming from dispatching to a lack of substitute bus drivers. Most of all, the drivers spoke of how much they care for the children of the township and the sense of community they say would be lost if the township were to privatize its routes.<\/p>\n<p>Drivers carried signs that read, \u201cKeep Our Children Safe, Keep Our Tax Dollars Here,\u201d and \u201cPrivatization Works for Profit, Public Employees Work For You!\u201d Another sign said, \u201cWhere\u2019s Your Friend the Bus Driver? I Don\u2019t Know, Mommy.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>District officials, however, clarified their layoff plan and said they would not be privatizing transportation service. The reduction in force would not mean the drivers would have to be replaced \u2013 new routing would allow a smaller number of drivers to efficiently bring children to and from school.<\/p>\n<p>The plan to lay off drivers was conceived after the district commissioned a report from Transportation Advisory Services, a New York consulting firm, to review the department.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cOne of the things they said needed to be addressed was ridership and that we weren\u2019t efficient in it,\u201d explained Interim Superintendent Richard Caldes. \u201cIt had been a long time since those routes had been looked at.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>That fact, combined with declining enrollment in the district, resulted in the plan. Board members also said there were reports of rampant absenteeism among drivers, though the drivers themselves disputed that allegation and said the district was relying too heavily on part-time \u201ccover drivers\u201d who sometimes show up for work and sometimes do not.<\/p>\n<p>Board member Susan Suter said she declined to even vote on the 2015-16 budget because she did not have enough information on the document, including transportation issues. Board member John Barton also said he was unaware of the layoffs, which were listed deep within the 932 page budget document.<\/p>\n<p>That led board member Michael Conti to make the motion to put off the layoffs for two weeks while the entire issue can be re-examined.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI think we should take a measured approach to this, especially with all that has been going on in the district,\u201d Conti said, adding that the arrest of former superintendent Walter Uszenski led him to question the layoff recommendation, which came from the former schools chief.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI think this was an ill-conceived plan from the start,\u201d said John Menshon, president of Transport Workers Union Local 225 Branch 4, which represents the drivers. \u201cWe even heard board members say that they were surprised, and they didn\u2019t know these cuts were hidden somewhere in the budget. Nobody had discussions with us, we were blindsided with this.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Ann Morgan, a driver in the district, said there are six bus runs per day that have no drivers even assigned , meaning the work must be split up between other drivers.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThen people retired, and they never replaced them,\u201d Morgan said. \u201cHow much can we do? We\u2019re doing two and three runs a day.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe grew up with our bus drivers. We\u2019ve known them since elementary school,\u201d said Taylor Baile, a junior at Brick Memorial High School. \u201cThey\u2019re not only our drivers, but in a sense they\u2019re our friends. They\u2019re the first people we see in the morning and the last people we see in the afternoon. They\u2019re not only our drivers but our neighbors.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Board President Sharon Cantillo said the goal of the board was to avoid a tax increase for the 2015-16 school year without cutting programs for students. Data she and other board members received indicated a significantly absenteeism issue in the department, Cantillo said.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIf every driver came to work, we could cut at least 29 drivers,\u201d Cantillo said, referring to the report.<\/p>\n<p>There may be room for negotiation and savings while limiting layoffs, said James Edwards, the district\u2019s business administrator.<\/p>\n<p>What was originally a plan to lay off 31 drivers has already been reduced to 26, he said, and if the district\u2019s in-house drivers can make runs to private and county schools at a cheaper rate than services provided by the Monmouth-Ocean Educational Services Commission, another seven jobs would be saved, reducing the number of layoffs to 19. Edwards said the district is required by law to inquire as to whether MOESC can provide transportation services at a lower rate.<\/p>\n<p>Still, the district must account for the reduction in the transportation budget.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cEvery time slot during the day, there are anywhere between 19 and 20 covers, where drivers do not have specific assignments,\u201d Edwards said. \u201cIf you look at that in a consolidation effort, at any time during the day we have 19 to 20 drivers being paid for full-time substituting.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Cantillo said district officials are planning to meet again with the TWU next Wednesday to continue negotiations and attempt to avert layoffs. Regardless, officials said, the district\u2019s busing will remain in-house.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe\u2019re not going out to a public bid advertising privatization,\u201d Edwards said.<\/p>\n<p>The vote to delay the layoff plan was approved unanimously by the board.<\/p>\n<div class=\"fcbkbttn_buttons_block\" id=\"fcbkbttn_left\"><div class=\"fb-share-button fcbkbttn_large_button \" data-href=\"https:\/\/shorebeat.com\/brick\/2015\/05\/brick-school-board-to-reconsider-bus-driver-layoff-plan-amidst-protests\/\" data-type=\"button_count\" data-size=\"large\"><\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Brick Township school board voted Thursday night to delay a plan to lay off 26 school bus drivers during a meeting that lasted more than six hours into early Friday morning. One-by-one, school bus drivers and union leaders addressed the board, describing a chaotic working environment and severe management issues that visibly took board [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":4858,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[13],"tags":[41,24,1356],"class_list":["post-4856","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-brick-schools","tag-board-of-education","tag-brick-nj-news","tag-bus-drivers"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/shorebeat.com\/brick\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/05\/DSC_0196.jpg","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pgt2Ft-1gk","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/shorebeat.com\/brick\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4856","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/shorebeat.com\/brick\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/shorebeat.com\/brick\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/shorebeat.com\/brick\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/shorebeat.com\/brick\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4856"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/shorebeat.com\/brick\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4856\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/shorebeat.com\/brick\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4858"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/shorebeat.com\/brick\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4856"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/shorebeat.com\/brick\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4856"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/shorebeat.com\/brick\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4856"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}