{"id":10419,"date":"2026-03-19T10:03:44","date_gmt":"2026-03-19T14:03:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/shorebeat.com\/tomsriver\/?p=10419"},"modified":"2026-03-19T10:04:19","modified_gmt":"2026-03-19T14:04:19","slug":"toms-river-asks-court-for-extension-to-adopt-affordable-housing-zoning-ordinances","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/shorebeat.com\/tomsriver\/2026\/03\/toms-river-asks-court-for-extension-to-adopt-affordable-housing-zoning-ordinances\/","title":{"rendered":"Toms River Asks Court for Extension to Adopt Affordable Housing, Zoning Ordinances"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"A<\/a>

A condominium under construction in Toms River. (Photo: Daniel Nee)<\/p><\/div>\n

Toms River Township has asked a judge to grant an extension of time to adopt ordinances that would effectuate an affordable housing settlement after disagreements between the mayor and council members boiled over last week, culminating in a confusing vote that failed to gain a majority required to adopt the measures. The state legislature had set a deadline of March 15 for towns to adopt affordable housing plans with no clear mechanism to request an extension, placing Toms River in uncharted legal waters with no indication the impasse between officials would resolve itself following a raucous council meeting last week.<\/p>\n

Pursuant to the state\u2019s controversial Mt. Laurel doctrine, Toms River was ordered to provide 1,700 additional units of designated affordable housing when Trenton released figures last year. Generally speaking, the 1,700 units would have been provided at a 20 percent ratio to market-rate units, meaning that more than 8,000 units would have to be built. The township put forth its own calculations opposing the state\u2019s data, but an activist group, the Fair Share Housing Center, challenged the township\u2019s findings. Fair Share Housing Center, over the past year, challenged the findings of near every municipality in the entire state, filing hundreds of lawsuits and effectively forcing settlements from the communities.<\/p>\n

As part of Toms River\u2019s settlement, approved last year, the township agreed to create 183 new housing units, while placing deed restrictions on a number of other properties \u2013 including the Hope\u2019s Crossing development \u2013 that would keep them designated as affordable housing for another 30 years. The controversy developed due to the fact that the township required a \u201cback up\u201d plan should the Hope\u2019s Crossing development owner refuse to accept the deed restrictions. The backup property was the swath of vacant land purchased by the township for $10 million<\/a> under the administration of former Mayor Maurice \u201cMo\u201d Hill. While the land was purchased by the township in 2016, it was never designated as open space \u2013 simply publicly-owned land \u2013 meaning it theoretically could be sold for development in the future. While there are no proposals to do so, objections were raised about the former farm property being part of the settlement, even in a backup fashion.<\/p>\n

The settlement plan dates back from June 2025 and was approved by the court \u2013 and the Fair Share Housing Center \u2013 in December, along with similar settlements reached by hundreds of other municipalities. The council, however, was required to pass ordinances to effectuate that settlement by updating the township\u2019s affordable housing plan and placing an overlay zone on top of other lands where affordable housing could be built in the future.<\/p>\n

A group of four council members opposed to Rodrick \u2013 Robert Bianchini, Thomas Nivison, David Ciccozzi, and Clint Bradley \u2013 either abstained from voting on those ordinances or voted them down. Rodrick\u2019s allies on the council, Craig Coleman, Lynn O\u2019Toole and Harry Aber, voted in favor of the ordinances. The group said they were responding to concerns from residents of the Lake Ridge development, which is located near portions of the overlay zone. They also said some residents within a 200-foot radius of the zone may not have received legal notices about the ordinance, though this allegation was made by a resident and it was not clear what methodology was utilized in his distance calculations.<\/p>\n

Rodrick said the failure of the council to adopt the measures could expose the town to so-called \u201cbuilder\u2019s remedy\u201d lawsuits, in which developers could intervene, claim the township has not met its affordable housing obligation, and seek to enforce the original 1,700 unit determination.<\/p>\n

\u201cThis is not a scare tactic,\u201d said Rodrick, in an op-ed column sent to local media outlets this week. \u201cThis is the law \u2014 and it has devastated other New Jersey communities that failed to act in time.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cI honestly don\u2019t know\u201d what the court will do with the extension request, Rodrick added, \u201cBut I will not sugarcoat the situation \u2014 it is serious, and the Council\u2019s vote is directly responsible for putting us here.\u201d<\/p>\n

Shorebeat sent several e-mails to Council President David Ciccozzi requesting comment on the council majority\u2019s intention moving forward, but did not receive a reply.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe residents of Toms River deserve leaders who put people before developers,\u201d said Rodrick. \u201cThat is exactly what I intend to keep doing.\u201d<\/p>\n

<\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Toms River Township has asked a judge to grant an extension of time to adopt ordinances that would effectuate an affordable housing settlement after disagreements between the mayor and council members boiled over last week, culminating in a confusing vote that failed to gain a majority required to adopt the measures. The state legislature had […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":7057,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[51,2105,1080,1993,2106,11],"class_list":["post-10419","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-government","tag-affordable-housing","tag-fair-share-housing-center","tag-featured","tag-newsbreak","tag-settlment","tag-toms-river-nj-news"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/shorebeat.com\/tomsriver\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/under_construction-scaled.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/shorebeat.com\/tomsriver\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10419","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/shorebeat.com\/tomsriver\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/shorebeat.com\/tomsriver\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/shorebeat.com\/tomsriver\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/shorebeat.com\/tomsriver\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10419"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/shorebeat.com\/tomsriver\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10419\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10420,"href":"https:\/\/shorebeat.com\/tomsriver\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10419\/revisions\/10420"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/shorebeat.com\/tomsriver\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7057"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/shorebeat.com\/tomsriver\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10419"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/shorebeat.com\/tomsriver\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10419"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/shorebeat.com\/tomsriver\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10419"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}